• Published on: Apr 20, 2020
  • 3 minute read
  • By: Dr Rajan Choudhary

Is Herd Immunity A Valid Strategy For COVID 19?

  • WhatsApp share link icon
  • copy & share link icon
  • twitter share link icon
  • facebook share link icon

Yesterday we explained you what Herd Immunity means and how it works, today we will take the discussion further to determine whether it is effective and can be recommended in the current context. 

COVID-19 currently does not have a cure or a vaccine. Lockdown is the only strategy that appears to be working. Could implementing policies that encourages herd immunity be used to accelerate immunity in the population without the need for a vaccine?

  1. INFECTIVITY

For the strategy to work we need to know a few things about the virus. How infective is it? In one of our earliest blogs we discussed infectivity at length and determined that the R0 (infectivity) may be between 2 and 3. This means each person with the virus can infect around 2-3 people at a time. Whilst this is not as high as Mumps (10-12) it is much higher than the common flu. The higher the R0 the more people that need to be immunised before herd immunity is achieved. For COVID it is estimated that 70% of the population need to be infected.

This is based off our current testing. Due to shortages in testing kits, only testing those that have a high likelihood of being infected and poorly organised testing infrastructure in some countries, we are likely underestimating. The number of people infected may be much higher as we are missing those that are asymptomatic but still have the disease and are still passing the disease on.

  1. MORTALITY

Secondly, we need to know the mortality from COVID-19. Early estimates of mortality were as high as 10%, as we had little data on how many people were truly infected, but as the number of infected cases rose, and testing amongst the infected and symptomatic population rose, a more accurate mortality has been found to be around 1%. There is a risk we may still be underestimating the true mortality, as some cities have noted a spike in cardiac deaths, and some evidence supports possible cardiac damage due to COVID. But from the data we have, we know its mortality is lower than MERS (34%) and SARS (10%) but more than influenza (0.1%).

estimates of the COVID-19 case fatality rate

Whilst we have some data on who is likely to suffer from severe COVID symptoms (elderly, immunocompromised, people with heart or lung problems) we still cannot accurately determine who will get severe COVID in the “low risk” population. Simply because someone is young and healthy does not mean they will not die from COVID.

  1. LENGTH OF IMMUNITY

Third we need to know how long this immunity will last. Similar coronaviruses responsible for the common cold usually create immunity that lasts for a few months, which is why we often get the cold repeatedly. A virus is also very prone to mutations that can change the structure and functions of its proteins, proteins responsible for tagging, latching on to and entering cells. If the structure of these proteins changes enough, then our antibodies will not be able to bind on, and new types of antibodies will have to be made with a slightly different structure. This effectively means our bodies have to start from step 1 again to create immunity, and we have to make new vaccines. This mutation rate is why we have to make new vaccines every season for the flu.

  1. LONG TERM COMPLICATIONS

Finally, we need to know if there are any long-term implications from a viral infection. Again, this is something we do not know yet, as the virus has only been around for a few months. There may be implications for the cardiovascular system, long term breathing problems or more. And even if the complication rate appears relatively low (say, 1%), if millions of people are allowed to get infected, by definitions thousands or tens of thousands of people will have these complications, complications that can lead to issues later in life or an early death.

CONCLUSION

So, is herd immunity a viable strategy for COVID? Without a safe vaccine the general consensus appears to be no.

We don’t know how infective the virus really is or how many people it has infected

A    1%     death rate is still very high. This means for every 100 people to be infected; one will die. This would mean hundreds of thousands of people dead in a country with a population over 10 million. It is unacceptably high.

If the death rate is 1%, then hospitalisation rate is likely higher. Almost all countries do not have capacity to have 1% of the population in hospital. Overwhelming the healthcare system will lead to poorer care, and worse care for those who do not have COVID. Leading to more people coming to serious harm or dying as a result of poor healthcare, not because of COVID.

We don’t know the long-term effects of COVID. By purposefully infecting people instead of waiting for a vaccine we may be causing unnecessary damage to a person’s health that only becomes apparent later in life. But this is speculation as we do not currently know if COVID has long term effects,

We don’t know if all of the risks above will amount to anything. The immunity may not last long enough, leading to another spike in infections and mortality.

Mass vaccination appears to be the safest strategy. And though human clinical trials have started on a number of vaccines, we are still months away from deployment.  Until then we should not come out of lockdown prematurely, not until we have received an unbiased assessment from public health officials that states it is safe.

Read Blog
Long working

Effects of Long Working Hours on Health: Risks to Body, Mind and Productivity

In today’s competitive and digitally connected world, long working hours have become normalised across industries. While dedication and productivity are valued, consistently working extended hours comes at a significant cost to health. The effects of long working hours on health are often gradual, making them easy to ignore until serious problems arise.

Medical research increasingly shows that prolonged work hours negatively affect physical health, mental wellbeing and long-term disease risk.

 

Why Long Working Hours Are Increasing

Several factors contribute to longer workdays:

  • demanding corporate culture
     

  • remote and hybrid work blurring boundaries
     

  • job insecurity
     

  • high performance expectations
     

  • constant digital connectivity
     

According to labour and health studies in India, many professionals routinely exceed recommended work-hour limits.

 

Stress and Hormonal Imbalance

Long working hours keep the body in a state of constant stress.

This leads to:

  • elevated cortisol levels
     

  • impaired stress recovery
     

  • hormonal imbalance
     

Chronic stress weakens immunity and accelerates disease development.

 

Mental Health Effects of Overworking

Burnout and Emotional Exhaustion

Burnout is characterised by emotional fatigue, detachment and reduced motivation. Long hours without adequate rest are a primary cause.

 

Anxiety and Depression

Extended work pressure increases anxiety levels and contributes to depressive symptoms, especially when combined with poor sleep.

 

Reduced Cognitive Function

Overworked individuals often experience:

  • poor concentration
     

  • decision fatigue
     

  • memory issues
     

This ironically reduces productivity.

 

Effects on Sleep and Recovery

Long working hours disrupt natural sleep patterns.

Common consequences include:

  • late-night sleeping
     

  • insufficient sleep duration
     

  • poor sleep quality
     

According to WHO, chronic sleep deprivation increases the risk of metabolic and cardiovascular diseases.

 

Cardiovascular Health Risks

One of the most serious effects of long working hours is increased heart disease risk.

Studies show long hours are associated with:

  • high blood pressure
     

  • elevated cholesterol
     

  • increased heart attack risk
     

ICMR data links work-related stress to rising cardiovascular disease in India.

 

Metabolic and Lifestyle Effects

Overworking often leads to:

  • irregular meals
     

  • increased fast food consumption
     

  • reduced physical activity
     

These habits contribute to:

  • obesity
     

  • insulin resistance
     

  • type 2 diabetes
     

Sedentary work combined with long hours compounds health risks.

 

Musculoskeletal Problems

Prolonged sitting and poor ergonomics result in:

  • back pain
     

  • neck and shoulder stiffness
     

  • joint discomfort
     

Without breaks and movement, these issues become chronic.

 

Impact on Immune Function

Chronic stress and lack of rest weaken immune response.

People working long hours often experience:

  • frequent infections
     

  • slower recovery from illness
     

WHO recognises stress and sleep deprivation as immune-suppressing factors.

 

Digestive Health Issues

Long working hours disrupt digestive rhythms.

Common problems include:

  • acidity
     

  • bloating
     

  • indigestion
     

  • irregular bowel habits
     

Late meals and stress worsen gut health.

 

Social and Emotional Consequences

Extended work hours reduce time for:

  • family
     

  • social interaction
     

  • physical activity
     

  • self-care
     

This imbalance affects emotional wellbeing and life satisfaction.

 

Long-Term Health Consequences

Prolonged overworking increases the risk of:

  • heart disease
     

  • stroke
     

  • diabetes
     

  • mental health disorders
     

  • reduced life expectancy
     

Lancet studies associate excessive working hours with increased mortality risk.

 

Who Is Most at Risk?

High-risk groups include:

  • corporate professionals
     

  • healthcare workers
     

  • IT and shift workers
     

  • gig economy workers
     

Young adults are increasingly affected.

 

Role of Preventive Health Checkups

Preventive health checkups help detect:

  • early blood pressure changes
     

  • cholesterol elevation
     

  • stress-related health markers
     

NITI Aayog emphasises workplace health screening to reduce disease burden.

 

How to Reduce Health Risks of Long Working Hours

Effective strategies include:

  • setting work boundaries
     

  • regular breaks and movement
     

  • prioritising sleep
     

  • balanced nutrition
     

  • stress management practices
     

  • regular health screening
     

Small consistent changes protect long-term health.

 

Organisational Role in Employee Health

Workplace policies supporting:

  • flexible hours
     

  • mental health initiatives
     

  • wellness programs
     

significantly reduce burnout and health risks.

 

When to Seek Medical Help

Consult a healthcare professional if experiencing:

  • chronic fatigue
     

  • sleep disturbances
     

  • persistent stress
     

  • chest discomfort
     

  • declining mental health
     

Early intervention prevents serious outcomes.

 

Conclusion

The effects of long working hours on health are profound and far-reaching. Chronic overworking increases stress, disrupts sleep, damages heart health and weakens mental resilience. While professional demands may be unavoidable at times, sustained long working hours without recovery pose serious health risks. Prioritising work-life balance, preventive healthcare and supportive workplace practices is essential for protecting physical health, mental wellbeing and long-term productivity.

 

References

  • Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) – Work Stress and Chronic Disease Studies
  • World Health Organization (WHO) – Working Hours and Health Guidelines
  • National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5) – Lifestyle and Occupational Health Data
  • Lancet – Long Working Hours and Cardiovascular Risk Studies
  • NITI Aayog – Workplace Wellness and Preventive Health Reports
  • Statista – Global Working Hours and Health Trends

See all

Live Doctor consultation
Live Doctor Chat

Download Our App & Get Consultation from anywhere.

App Download
call icon for mobile number calling and whatsapp at secondmedic